|
Originally ALL Coordinate Measuring
Machines were manufactured to a high very precision and
were mechanically accurate. It was not uncommon
for manufacturers to offer 2 different grades of CMM
accuracy for the same model; the higher accuracy being
attained by dedicating more care and attention in the
final assembly and calibration process.
The first error mapping techniques
were introduced to aid the linear accuracy calibration
of individual CMM axes. The magnitude of errors
introduced into the map was very small, generally
limited to scale error and squareness error, indicating
the intrinsic accuracy in-built into the CMM. Later many
CMM manufactures were building CMM’s from Aluminium; an
initiative that started a trend that has subsequently
become the norm. The only issue they faced was how
to make Aluminium CMM’s accurate.
Answer: throw the large errors
prevalent in an Aluminium structure into the error map
and force the map to make the CMM structure accurate.
Maps were designed to only meet the
accuracy standard currently in vogue and assist the
manufacturer in passing the "test". One by one
manufacturers went to Aluminium structures attracted by
much reduced manufacturing costs. Manufacturers became
dependent upon error correction software; their
confidence in this fundamental technique increased with
time and subsequently relaxed manufacturing tolerances
further as they improved with experience error
collection and mapping procedures.
Aluminium CMM’s are typically built
by unskilled personnel and have no accuracy whatsoever
until error mapped into specification. Aluminium CMM’s
offer no benefit, other than price, to the end users.
Manufacturer of Aluminium CMM’s claim Aluminium is the
perfect material for CMM build, but how so since its
coefficient of expansion is almost four times that of
granite and yet its specific weight is only 1% less than
granite, therefore Granite is the choice of material for
CMM Manufacture not Aluminium.
|